User reported discrepancy for Aged payables (A/P Aging) report printed last May 30, 2010 for supplier P11001A and same report printed currently as of July 2011.
Cause:
This happens when DM has been applied and when period end has been processed. As a result, transaction will be removed from the main table and put to the history table. Ergo it will no longer be seen in the AP Aging report.
Solution:
For the issue above. Below are corresponding DM entries:
- APV 10IPR506 – DM F0800629
- CM 12M154A – DM 11JV610C
No comments:
Post a Comment